What's up, it's Zayd

Last month, one of our customers came to me really frustrated. The friend that had told them about Valley was booking multiple calls a day and singing our praises (love that song. keep singin’ champ), but they were barely booking any. They’d copied his strategy to the letter. If it’s not broke, don’t break it. That had to be the cheat code, right? They were in a similar space, so it would make sense to have the same targeting criteria, same messaging angles, and same follow-up cadence? And honestly…I’d do it too and save myself hours of time if it actually worked, but that’s not how it works.

It's a pattern I've now seen dozens of times, and it reveals something most people in outbound refuse to accept: the strategy that works for someone else is often the exact strategy that will kill your pipeline.

Like your mom said, you are your own very special snowflake.

Forwarded this email? Get Enabled in your inbox each week.

My favorite finds of the week

Every outbound strategy has a shelf life (and it's getting shorter).

TLDR: Someone figures out that an approach that works. They talk about it on LinkedIn. They share the framework in a podcast. A newsletter writes it up (yes, hi, hello, that’s me). Within 8 weeks, 200 companies in that space are running a near-identical playbook.

The prospects on the receiving end end up getting the same angle, the same opener, and the same value prop framing from dozens of companies simultaneously. Response rates crater because the strategy became common.

I call this Strategy Decay.

It works like radioactive half-life. The more people who adopt an approach, the faster its effectiveness deteriorates for everyone running it.

Think about the "personalized first line" trend from a couple years ago. When the first few companies started referencing a prospect's recent LinkedIn post in their opening line, it felt magical. Now, every SDR on the planet leads with "Saw your post about [X], loved your take on [Y]." It's become wallpaper. People scroll right past it.

The tactic worked for a while, but by the time you copy a move that's already being discussed publicly, you're almost always too late.

Back to our two customers. Same tool, same strategy template, opposite results.

There are three things that can't be copy-pasted:

The original customer had been posting content about their space for 18 months before turning on outbound. When their messages landed in someone's inbox, the prospect often already recognized the name. The copycat had zero brand awareness so there was no pre-existing context.

If you're the 15th company this quarter to message a Head of Marketing at a Series B SaaS company about "improving outbound," it doesn't matter how clever your angle is. The prospect is exhausted by the category. The original customer was one of the first to target their niche with that angle. The copycat was one of many in a flock of sheep.

The best outbound messages show a founder's authentic understanding of the problem. That’s not something that can be templated. At least not effectively. When I send outreach about outbound challenges, it lands differently than when someone in a totally different space borrows my framing.

2026 Guide to LinkedIn Outreach with inmail changes and safety checklist

You need to build a strategy with a moat that can't be replicated by reading a LinkedIn post.

The best outbound strategies are built on data only you have access to. Your customer conversations. Your product usage patterns. Your website visitor behavior. Your win/loss analysis.

When we did our Carol Method analysis at Valley, we discovered that lead gen agencies were spending 6x more than any other segment. Nobody else could have known that because it's our data. Our entire outbound strategy shifted based on insights no competitor could access.

If your strategy is built on publicly available information like job titles, company sizes, and industry trends, then by definition anyone can build the same strategy.

Most outbound messaging sounds the same because most companies position themselves the same way. "We help [target] do [thing] faster/better/cheaper."

The positioning angles that can't be copied are the ones rooted in a genuine point of view about the market. Instead of leading with a feature comparison or a pricing advantage, share an actual opinion about how the world works and where it's headed.

Valley's point of view is that volume-based outbound is destroying the sales profession and that the future belongs to companies that treat every outreach touchpoint like a warm introduction. That's what shapes every message we send in a way that can't be replicated by copying our templates.

This is the most underrated one. The best outbound targets the right person with the right message, at the right moment.

Website intent signals. Content engagement patterns. Hiring activity. Funding announcements. Leadership changes. These are timing triggers that create urgency and relevance that a static, copied playbook can never replicate.

When someone visits your pricing page at 2pm and gets a personalized message by 2:15pm, the conversion dynamics are fundamentally different from blasting the same message to a cold list on a Tuesday morning because some blog post said Tuesday mornings have the best open rates.

Ask yourself these questions: